Washington, Nov mber 26: Negatively framed messages may not be an effective way to reach those most in need of persuasion, suggests a new study by researchers from Indiana University and Wayne State University.
“The findings are somewhat ironic because a whole lot of public service announcements say, ‘Drugs are bad for you,’ ‘Just say no,’ or ‘This is your brain on drugs’ with an image of an egg frying,” said principal investigator Joshua Brown, associate professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences in IU Bloomington’s College of Arts and Sciences.
“What we’re seeing is that negative messages are not having the same impact on the brain,” he stated.
Using neuroimaging techniques, the researchers examined the impact of different messages on the brains of substance-dependent individuals and compared them to their effects on non-substance-dependent individuals.
They also sought to determine where the problem lies in the circuit between message, brain and behaviour, where the signal goes wrong. Is it in the relationship between brain activity and behaviour or in the impact of the message on the brain? Perhaps the brains of substance-dependent people are sensitive to risk, but the knowledge does not guide their behaviour. Or perhaps substance-dependent people perceive messages differently in the first place.
To answer these questions, participants took part in a virtual game, the Iowa Gambling Task, often used in psychological studies on decision-making. Four decks of cards appear on a screen, and the participants were told they will either win or lose money by choosing certain decks.
The substance-dependent group showed less brain activity in response to the negatively framed message that a certain deck would lead to losses. The negative messages also led to significantly worse, riskier decisions in the substance-dependent group than in the non-user group.
The findings suggest that the level of brain activity in regions of the brain that assess risk is lower in substance-dependent individuals than those who are not drug- or alcohol-dependent. These two groups process the messages differently, particularly those messages that emphasize loss or reduced prospects for gain.
The research contributes to a growing body of health communication literature that examines the impact of particular types of messages on the neural mechanisms involved in making risky decisions.
It also contributes to a larger story about the regions of the brain that are activated in response to risk and danger. One particular region, the anterior cingulate cortex, is heavily involved in a variety of clinical disorders including drug abuse, ADHD, autism, schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Brown said they can’t yet say whether positive messages are more effective at reducing drug use because their experiment involved decisions about money rather than drugs. They are working on it, though, and have just started to look at how people make decisions with respect to drugs.
The research appeared in Psychology of Addictive Behaviours. (ANI)