Washington, December 4: A new analysis of topographic and gravity data from Titan has indicated that the icy outer crust of the Saturn’s largest moon is twice as thick as has generally been thought.
Scientists have long suspected that a vast ocean of liquid water lies under the crust. The new study suggested that the internally generated heat that keeps that ocean from freezing solid depends far more on Titan’s interactions with Saturn and its other moons than had been suspected.
Howard Zebker, a professor of geophysics and of electrical engineering at Stanford University, is part of the team interpreting radar data of Titan acquired by NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, which has been orbiting Saturn since 2004.
He has been studying the topography of Titan, and has combined improved radar measurements of the moon’s surface with newly released gravity measurements to make the new analysis.
As Titan orbits Saturn, Titan is slowly spinning on its axis, one spin for each trip around Saturn. Still, that spin is enough for the gravity instrument onboard Cassini to measure the resistance of Titan to any changes in its spin-also called the moment of inertia.
“The moment of inertia depends essentially on the thickness of the layers of material within Titan,” Zebker said.
Thus, he and his graduate students were able to use that data to calculate the moon’s internal structure.
“The picture of Titan that we get has an icy, rocky core with a radius of a little over 2,000 kilometers, an ocean somewhere in the range of 225 to 300 kilometers thick and an ice layer that is 200 kilometers thick,” he said.
Previous models of Titan’s structure estimated the icy crust to be approximately 100 kilometers thick. So if there is more ice, then there should be less heat from the core than had been estimated. One way to account for less heat being generated internally is for there to be less rock and more ice in the core than previous models had predicted.
That all seems simple enough, but there is a complication. Titan is not a true sphere. Its shape is distorted by the gravitational pull of Saturn, making the moon sort of oblong along its equator and a little flattened at the poles.
From measurements of the observed gravitational field of Titan, one can compute what the shape of Titan ought to be. But the new data show that Titan’s shape is much more distorted than would be predicted by a simple gravitational model.
That discrepancy means the internal structure of Titan isn’t quite so simple.
For Titan to exert its observed gravitational pull, the average density from any given point on the moon down to the center of the core has to be the same, said Zebker.
But that’s not the case, since Titan is somewhat squashed. For the data to line up, the density of material under the poles must be slightly greater than it is under the equator.
Since liquid water is denser than ice, Zebker’s team reasoned that the ice layer must be slightly thinner at the poles than at the core, and the layer of water correspondingly thicker.
The team members calculated that the thickness of the icy crust is about 3,000 meters less than average at the poles and 3,000 meters greater than average at the equator. And the combination of gravity and topography further suggests that the average thickness of the icy layer is about 200 km.
For the icy crust to vary in thickness across Titan’s surface, the heat distribution within the moon must vary as well. But that variation is not likely to come from the moon’s core-heat generated there would be fairly uniform in all directions.
Zebker said the variation in ice thickness could be a result of variation in the shape of Titan’s orbit around Saturn, which is not perfectly circular.
The planet’s other moons also exert some tidal influence on Titan as they all follow their different orbits, but the primary tidal influence is Saturn.
Zebker will present the findings at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in San Francisco. (ANI)